New AWS Config Rules - LambdaLess and rust(y)

AWS Config checks all your resources for compliance. With 260 managed rules, it covers a lot of ground. But if you need additional checks until now, you had to write a complex Lambda function. With the new “Custom Policy” type, it is possible to use declarative Guard rules. Custom Policy rules use less lines of code and are so much easier to read.

AWS CloudFormation Guard is a “general-purpose policy-as-code evaluation tool”, which means it interprets rules. The Guard tool is used inside AWS Config and you can use it offline , which makes development easy. It is written in Rust.

The first part of this post shows you the example from the AWS documentation, which checks a DynamoDB table. In the second part I will show you how to create these rules yourself.

What is AWS Config?

AWS Config

AWS Config checks your resources and provides configuration snapshots. All changes of these Configuration Items are stored in a timeline. So you may exactly see when resource configuration changes. In addition to that, you may query the config database for resources.

What types of rules exist?

AWS managed Rules

There are 260 managed rules. You can apply them quickly, and no code is needed. A list is provided in the Config documentation.

Custom Lambda Rules

Sometimes you need additional or special checks. Until April 2022, you had to write a custom Lambda rule. The AWS rdk - rule development kit supports the development of custom Lambda rules. I have built some of those rules for several projects and found the development process quite complex. If you want to check only an attribute of a resource, you need about 40 lines of code.

Checking DynamoDB with a custom Lambda rule.

For instance if you want to check a DynamoDB table, in the Lambda function the first thing you have to do is check the table status, like in the DYNAMODB_ENCRYPTED Rule:

status_table = configuration_item["configuration"]["tableStatus"]
    if status_table == "DELETING":
    return build_evaluation_from_config_item(configuration_item, 'NOT_APPLICABLE')

You can see the whole 440 line Lambda function in the AWS Config Rules repository on github.

Custom Policy Rules

This is the same check as Guard 2.0 rule fragment:

 when configuration.tableStatus == 'ACTIVE'

There is also a change in the programming logic. You do not think in programm steps, you think in rules and filters. With the Guard rules you filter the not applicable items with the when query. These query are documented in the CloudFormation Guard repository.

First complete rule: Checking DynamoDB for point-in-time backup anables

In the Creating Custom Policy Rules documentation the example checks a Table for point in time recovery:

let status = ['ACTIVE']

rule tableisactive when
    resourceType == "AWS::DynamoDB::Table" {
    configuration.tableStatus == %status

rule checkcompliance when
    resourceType == "AWS::DynamoDB::Table"
    tableisactive {
        let pitr = supplementaryConfiguration.ContinuousBackupsDescription.pointInTimeRecoveryDescription.pointInTimeRecoveryStatus
        %pitr == "ENABLED"

Let’s break this down:

In the first rule, tableisactive,Tables are filtered for being ‘ACTIVE’.

The second rule called “checkcompliance” uses a variable pitr(point in time recovery) to check the supplementaryConfiguration.

This supplementaryConfiguration is the DynamoDB backup configuration. You read it with the AWS CLI:

aws dynamodb describe-continuous-backups --table-name $table

The output is, for example:

    "ContinuousBackupsDescription": {
        "ContinuousBackupsStatus": "ENABLED",
        "PointInTimeRecoveryDescription": {
            "PointInTimeRecoveryStatus": "ENABLED",
            "EarliestRestorableDateTime": "2022-04-25T16:38:44+02:00",
            "LatestRestorableDateTime": "2022-05-22T09:18:03.639000+02:00"

So supplementaryConfiguration.ContinuousBackupsDescription.pointInTimeRecoveryDescription.pointInTimeRecoveryStatus reads “ENABLED”, which evaluates to passing the check for this example table.

Unfortunately, I have not yet found any documentation on the supplementaryConfiguration for different resourceType.

Development Steps for a simple example

Now for a simpler example, how to develop custom Guard rules which only checks the base configuration of the resource, not the supplementaryConfiguration.

I will take the well known Lambda Runtime example. This example is also covered as a managed rule lambda-function-settings-check. The check evaluates to compliant if the Lambda Function uses the newest runtime of the development languages.

Guard Rule development steps

Step 1) Find configuration item and the structure Step 2) Create the rule code Step 3) Create Rule resource with debug option Step 4) Create a PASS and a FAIL resource for testing Step 5) Debug and change code with Logs

Step 1: Find configuration items

The structure of the configuration item can be found with the AWS CLI describe commands, like aws lambda get-function --function-name $name.

"Configuration": {
    "FunctionName": "compare-py-9",
    "FunctionArn": "arn:aws:lambda:eu-central-1:795048271754:function:compare-py-9",
    "Runtime": "python3.9"},

As the structure is correct, the case of the names is wrong. We need to look at the “Runtime” attribute, but is is stored as “runtime”. How do I know this? The better way is to use the Config Resource Inventory.

Image description Youd find items in the Config Dashboard (1). Open a Lambda Function item (2).

Image description The rules are checked against this configuration item.

This is a fragment of the Config Configuration Item:

  "version": "1.3",
  "accountId": "795048271754",
  "resourceType": "AWS::Lambda::Function",
  "resourceId": "compare-py-9",
  "resourceName": "compare-py-9",
  "configuration": {
    "functionName": "compare-py-9",
    "functionArn": "arn:aws:lambda:eu-central-1:795048271754:function:compare-py-9",
    "runtime": "python3.9",

So the field we check in Config is configuration.runtime.

Now I create the rule. You find the documentation for Guard in the github repository You will see that there are mostly CloudFormation examples, because Guard is used for CloudFormation template checks in the first place. But it can be used for any structures.

Step 2: Create the rule code

The first part of the rule is to filter for the Resource type:

 resourceType == "AWS::Lambda::Function" 

If you check at the deepest configuration level, it is a good idea to check the API documentation for the allowed values.

The allowed runtime values are:

Valid Values: nodejs | nodejs4.3 | nodejs6.10 | nodejs8.10 | nodejs10.x | nodejs12.x | nodejs14.x | nodejs16.x | java8 | java8.al2 | java11 | python2.7 | python3.6 | python3.7 | python3.8 | python3.9 | dotnetcore1.0 | dotnetcore2.0 | dotnetcore2.1 | dotnetcore3.1 | dotnet6 | nodejs4.3-edge | go1.x | ruby2.5 | ruby2.7 | provided | provided.al2

As this attribute is not required (Required: No) I need to check for the existence at first:

  WHEN configuration.runtime !EMPTY {

For the values itself there is the “IN” function:

configuration.runtime IN ['python3.9','go1.x','nodejs16.x']

So the whole check is 6 lines long:

rule lambdaruntimenewest when
    resourceType == "AWS::Lambda::Function" {
     WHEN configuration.runtime !EMPTY {
    configuration.runtime IN ['python3.9','go1.x','nodejs16.x']

Step 3: Create Rule resource with debug option

Open the Config Service in the AWS console and create a rule with type “Create custom rule using Guard”. For this example the name is LambdaRuntime.

Be sure to add a description which tells the reader what attributes are checked.

Image description

  1. The Name of the rule - the CloudWatch debug log will be named accordingly, here “LambdaRuntime”
  2. A descriptive description “Checks runtime of Lambda for newest runtime”
  3. Enable logs - disable them later

Image description 4) Rule content

Image description

  1. Limit to Lambda resources
  2. AWS Resources (not third party)
  3. Choose Lambda

You do not need a picture for these steps, do you? 8) Click “Next” 9) Click “Add rule” in the “Review and create” step

Step 4 Create a PASS and a FAIL resource for testing

Now you create a Lambda Function, which passes the check. Save the configuration item as “pass.json”.

Save the failing Lambda Function configuration as “fail.json”

You can use these files for local development later.

Step 5 Debug and change code with Logs

You will find the debug log in CloudWatch Log. The log group will have the name of the rule prepended like:


Make sure to set a retention time and disable the debug output option later, because a lot of log entries are generated.

Image description Now you can Re-Evaluate the new rule to trigger an execution. If your pass Function passes and your fail Function fails, you are done!

This was development with the AWS console. Now I will show you the local development. First you have to install Guard according to Guard on github.

Local Development

With installed Guard tool, you can develop rules locally, if the do not use supplementaryConfiguration.

Save fail configuration item as fail.json and passed item as pass.json.

If you just want to test Guard, you can use the code at megaproaktiv on github - config-guard.

Validate fail

cfn-guard validate --data  fail.json --rules LambdaRuntime.rule

The data parameter points to the data file and the rules parameter to the rules file.


fail.json Status = FAIL
FAILED rules
LambdaRuntime.rule/lambdaruntimenewest    FAIL
Evaluation of rules LambdaRuntime.rule against data fail.json
Property [/configuration/runtime] in data [fail.json] is not compliant with [LambdaRuntime.rule/lambdaruntimenewest] because provided value ["nodejs14.x"] did not match expected value ["python3.9"]. Error Message []
Property [/configuration/runtime] in data [fail.json] is not compliant with [LambdaRuntime.rule/lambdaruntimenewest] because provided value ["nodejs14.x"] did not match expected value ["go1.x"]. Error Message []
Property [/configuration/runtime] in data [fail.json] is not compliant with [LambdaRuntime.rule/lambdaruntimenewest] because provided value ["nodejs14.x"] did not match expected value ["nodejs16.x"]. Error Message []

Validate Pass

cfn-guard validate --data  pass.json --rules LambdaRuntime.rule


pass.json Status = PASS
PASS rules
LambdaRuntime.rule/lambdaruntimenewest    PASS
Evaluation of rules LambdaRuntime.rule against data pass.json
Rule [LambdaRuntime.rule/lambdaruntimenewest] is compliant for template [pass.json]


The new Custom Policy Rules type makes the writing of simple checks very easy. The existence of the rules engine as a local open-source tool simplifies rules development.

The supplementaryConfiguration should be documented, which is not the case now.

Also, it is the first AWS Rust backend service I have seen, so this is an exciting trend!

What do you think about rusty Custom Policy Rules?

For more AWS development stuff follow me on twitter @megaproaktiv

See also

Similar Posts You Might Enjoy

About Optimizing for Speed: How to do complete AWS Security&Compliance Scans in 5 minutes

The project steampipe uses a fast programing language and an intelligent caching approach outrunning prowler speed tenfold. While I tried to workaround prowlers limits I learned a lot about optimizing. - by Gernot Glawe

(Prevent) Hacking into a CloudService - About security, ECS and terraform AWS UserGroup Hannover Online Meetup Feb, 4th 2021

Yoni: Oftentimes, when we think about protecting resources in the cloud, we immediately think about the typical ways in - via public-facing applications or abuse of credentials. In this talk, we will look at one additional way: through the work unit parameters of a service. During the development of Indeni’s Cloudrail SaaS product, Yoni was responsible for trying to find ways to hack into the service. One of the ways he found, raises questions about how secure ECS workloads really are. - by Yoni Leitersdorf , Gernot Glawe , Malte Walkowiak

Rotate your credentials and don't forget MFA

According to the Well-Architected Framework and the least privileges principle, you should change your access keys and login password regularly. Therefore the user should have the right to edit their credentials. But only their own. Also using MFA - multi-factor authentication enhances the security even more. Therefore the user should be able to change MFA. But only their own. But how to do that? You have to combine two parts of AWS documentation. We will show you how you provide a “self-editing” group for your users with the CDK. - by Gernot Glawe